Documentation for Fake News Fitness 2.0 can be found here: docs.fakenewsfitness.org
I chose this rank because I believe that this author is completely bias. The author also does not back up their claims with evidence which is another reason that I do not trust this website.
Why dont you think that the author backed up his claims with evidence?
Do you think that the author actually knows what he is talking about when it comes to fracking?
Why did the author write this article in the first place?
Do you agree with the author?
Why or Why not?
Do you think that this is a trustworthy website?
Nathan
Fri, 09/22/2017 - 09:18
Permalink
Lack of evidence
the author actually knows what he is talking about, which is a bridge to natural gas in new york.
the site supports fracking which is why I trust this site.
Comments
Nathan
Fri, 09/22/2017 - 09:18
Permalink
You're right
Lack of evidence
the author actually knows what he is talking about, which is a bridge to natural gas in new york.
the site supports fracking which is why I trust this site.